Skip to main content

wile_e_coyote69

About

Location: United StatesMember since: Nov 10, 2001

All feedback (56)

ryanchm (938)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Prompt response. Great eBayer!
fancy_pawn (618)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Great communication. A pleasure to do business with.
toross9 (168)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
The best buyer Thanks A+++++
bedfordcameraandvideo (809)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Great communication. A pleasure to do business with.
thomas_11store (1486)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Quick response and fast payment. perfect! Thanks!
renu4ushop (34508)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
‹(•¿•)› .... Excellent eBay Buyer .....Thank you .... ‹(•¿•)› ....����������
Reviews (4)
Oct 11, 2011
A great phone for value, first timers, or no frills Android users.
A lot of people rag on this phone for one reason or another, but I've found that over the past year and a half that I've owned the Motorola Cliq, it's really been an excellent companion. It's a very very sturdy feeling android phone geared towards messaging and fun. While it won't allow you to move apps to the SD card because of its antiquated 2.1 OS (a 2.2 or 2.3 update would have made this thing MUCH MUCH BETTER!) and frankly it's very slow compared to newer phones, it's a VERY NICE phone to have as a backup, a first Android, or if you're just a value seeker who wants a great phone for the money. With the right adjustments, the battery will last with the best of them. Also, the software on this thing from Motoblur is first rate. I wish the MyTouch 4G I'm replacing this with had a lot of the shortcuts in the power menu such as wifi/GPS/bluetooth toggles, and the ringer on/off switch on the side. I will be buying one of these used as a backup, and maybe just to use for fun, sometimes!
Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM AF Zoom Lens w/Filter from Japan 619562
Aug 03, 2020
Nice smaller standard zoom lens.
I have several standard zoom lenses, but I picked this one up because it was a lot smaller and lighter than the others I own. This makes it a better walkaround choice, especially if you're using a smaller body. Of course, the quality is 100% Canon all the way, and the images come out crisp and clear.
Jun 04, 2012
Not perfect, but GREAT lens for the money
I bought the EF 70-300 f/4.0-5.6 IS USM zoom lens because I was looking for the extra length that my EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM wasn't delivering for things like sports and wildlife and when subjects were out of reach. I had originally considered the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM lens but opted for the significantly less expensive 70-300mm lens because I had heard good reviews about the lens and decided to try and save some money in the process of expanding my opportunities. This lens has sharpness to be appreciated! When shooting wildlife (birds, squirrels, frogs, turtles, etc...) the extra reach is very handy and everything turns out very nicely. Neatly blurred backgrounds provide a good smooth canvas for clear subjects that really stand out. Image stabilizer system may be a tad noisy (noticeable, at least) but what it lacks in silence, it makes up for in competence as I was able to hand hold even slow shutter speeds of around 1/10th sec even at full 300mm zoom! There are, however, a few things I wish this lens did have that it does not. The front of the lens rotates during focus and extends when zooming, and the Micro-USM system does NOT allow full-time manual focus, and the lens lacks a distance scale. The more expensive L-series lens does have all these features, along with others I didn't bother listing, but lacks image stabilization. Finally, the lens does display some pincushion distortion, although, depending on how your shots are edited, you might never notice. There may be some things that this lens is not PERFECT for, but for the small bit it lacks, it easily makes up for. VERY NICE for the money!
8 of 8 found this helpful