About
All feedback (349)
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- techsensesolutions (355912)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- mels95 (136)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchasePrompt payment, grateful, no issues
- qualityflagsrus (5329)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, highly recommended.
- am-autoparts (3449436)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchase5 STARS!! Hope to do business with you again! Thank you!
Reviews (5)

Jul 03, 2017
Great Grommet Press
I have been using grommet presses like this one for several years. This particular one is the easiest one I have ever used. It consistently makes great punches and smooth grommets. Although it is heavy enough to have the muscle to be a great grommet press, it isn't as heavy as some others on the market and I'm thankful for it. I have other presses that are unnecessarily heavy. This is just the right weight and balance. Not too heavy and not too light. The handle gives you plenty of leverage to easily set grommets. If I had to buy another grommet press, I would seek this one out.

Nov 13, 2018
Great antenna
Quick Easy Set Up. Received over 40 channels. Most in HD. Not bad for just a few bucks.

Jul 02, 2019
Junk
Bought 2 CMYK sets. 1st job was 500 pages of flash cards. Mostly 1 question black text with 1-2 word black text answer. There was an occasional blue or red accent mark. The yellow cartridge had to be replaced before the 500 flash cards were finished. The 2nd yellow toner was damaged straight of the package and toner literally poured out of it when the pull tabs were pulled. Caused over $500 dollars in damage. Magenta had to be replaced around 600 pages, again practically no yellow or magenta was actually used, but both ran out embarrassingly fast.