jtjagrucker on eBay

Jul 08, 2010

Performs like a $400 camera. Read the comparison.

You wouldn't believe that you bought if for around $200-$250. I got mine for a steal on Ebay, but I wouldn't have a problem paying that much after experiencing it. The color on the S620 is vivid with my indoor shots and is definitely a step up from the 10mp Coolpix, which lacked a great deal in indoor pics and/or low light (regardless of the settings). The drawback is the zoom quality for far away pictures. The image needs a lot of adjustments, and even then it loses a lot of the detail (common for most cameras and I'm not surprised). However, for true close ups, there is an option for a "Close Up" shot in your photo settings. I have experimented with this feature and it works wonderfully. I also love to play with the "Quick Retouch" option. It really does make a difference in definition, clarity, and color. A fun effective add-on for this series. I have the Sony Cybershot 12.1 MP S2100, which initially is a lot cheaper than the Coolpix S620. I found that the Cybershot has a quicker response time. However, it lacks in features when compared to the Coolpix, among other things. Inside pics were not notably different, as each have close to the same vivid color and definition. The Cybershot and Coolpix take very good close-up nature shots, and I actually preferred the effect of the Cybershot close up. What is notable however, is that the Cybershot lacks in color on closeups, especially in cloudy conditions. The Coolpix however, fixes issues with dull color on cloudy days with the "Quick Retouch" option. Because of that, the Coolpix won in this comparison. A photograph of the sun by the Coolpix was submitted to a photography forum. Without stating publicly the camera I used, it received rave reviews from professionals. Many were surprised by the fact that I used a "cheaper" camera, and it turned out so beautifully. A true testament to what this camera can do with the right features. Coolpix has a universal SD Card slot and rechargeable battery. I am even able to recharge the battery from my old Coolpix 10mp battery charger, so this gives me an additional charger. Although, make sure that voltage on your batteries do not vary greatly, though they may fit, it may not be recommended to charge the battery with any Coolpix battery charger. Sony is notorious for not being compatible with universal objects, such as an SD card. Additionally, the Cybershot uses two AA batteries. Thus, you have the extra expense in the Sony SD card, rechargeable AA batteries, and AA battery charging station. These are major drawbacks for me, and enough reason to chose the Coolpix over the Cybershot. This makes the Coolpix much more economic and an overall better buy, even though the initial price is more expensive. And, the additional features for the Coolpix gives it the ability to compete with some of the more expensive cameras. Overall, I would definitely recommend this to anyone who is on a budget and wants to take great family photos, as well as some amateur nature shots. A very dependable camera. I gave it a well-deserved 5 Stars. Compared to others in the same price range, it stands alone because of it features and dependability.

3 of 3 found this helpful

Jul 08, 2010

Performs like a $400 camera. Read the comparison.

You wouldn't believe that you bought if for around $200-$250. I got mine for a steal on Ebay, but I wouldn't have a problem paying that much after experiencing it. The color on the S620 is vivid with my indoor shots and is definitely a step up from the 10mp Coolpix, which lacked a great deal in indoor pics and/or low light (regardless of the settings). The drawback is the zoom quality for far away pictures. The image needs a lot of adjustments, and even then it loses a lot of the detail (common for most cameras and I'm not surprised). However, for true close ups, there is an option for a "Close Up" shot in your photo settings. I have experimented with this feature and it works wonderfully. I also love to play with the "Quick Retouch" option. It really does make a difference in definition, clarity, and color. A fun effective add-on for this series. I have the Sony Cybershot 12.1 MP S2100, which initially is a lot cheaper than the Coolpix S620. I found that the Cybershot has a quicker response time. However, it lacks in features when compared to the Coolpix, among other things. Inside pics were not notably different, as each have close to the same vivid color and definition. The Cybershot and Coolpix take very good close-up nature shots, and I actually preferred the effect of the Cybershot close up. What is notable however, is that the Cybershot lacks in color on closeups, especially in cloudy conditions. The Coolpix however, fixes issues with dull color on cloudy days with the "Quick Retouch" option. Because of that, the Coolpix won in this comparison. A photograph of the sun by the Coolpix was submitted to a photography forum. Without stating publicly the camera I used, it received rave reviews from professionals. Many were surprised by the fact that I used a "cheaper" camera, and it turned out so beautifully. A true testament to what this camera can do with the right features. Coolpix has a universal SD Card slot and rechargeable battery. I am even able to recharge the battery from my old Coolpix 10mp battery charger, so this gives me an additional charger. Although, make sure that voltage on your batteries do not vary greatly, though they may fit, it may not be recommended to charge the battery with any Coolpix battery charger. Sony is notorious for not being compatible with universal objects, such as an SD card. Additionally, the Cybershot uses two AA batteries. Thus, you have the extra expense in the Sony SD card, rechargeable AA batteries, and AA battery charging station. These are major drawbacks for me, and enough reason to chose the Coolpix over the Cybershot. This makes the Coolpix much more economic and an overall better buy, even though the initial price is more expensive. And, the additional features for the Coolpix gives it the ability to compete with some of the more expensive cameras. Overall, I would definitely recommend this to anyone who is on a budget and wants to take great family photos, as well as some amateur nature shots. A very dependable camera. I gave it a well-deserved 5 Stars. Compared to others in the same price range, it stands alone because of it features and dependability.

2 of 2 found this helpful

Mikasa STEPHANIE PLATINUM Wine Glass 2290608

May 19, 2016

Elegant, versatile, and easy to match. But stem is weak.

These are elegant and beautiful. Great quality crystal and very versatile - appropriate for nearly all special occasions. At 9oz capacity, they are the perfect size for quests. The crystal is curved with a prestigious effect making it visually appealing on the table. They look pricey and gorgeous. The style is nearly timeless. The only drawback, and why I deducted one star, is the fragile nature of the stem. It is very skinny, thus only a minor-moderate amount of pressure will break it. I broke it nearly right away just by holding it while I was washing. I had to replace, and at over $20 a glass that is something you don't forget. I'm concerned that over time more will break and I won't be able to find them. Thus, I do suggest that you get extra glasses in case any do break. Overall: I would recommend to not hold the stem while washing and be careful when drying. I wouldn't trust them in a high heat dishwasher, although I always hand wash and suggest anyone do the same. Otherwise, these are beautiful glasses to own and are easy to match with other platinum rimmed dishes. The platinum seems to hold up quite well. I also have the matching water goblets, which are a lot more sturdy. I highly recommend both.

jtjagrucker

jtjagrucker

Shop by category

About

Feedback ratings

Last 12 months

All feedback (1,155)

About