About
All feedback (108)
- e***r (5461)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchase5 star seller!
- adidas_official (603656)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseHope to deal with you again. Thank you.~adidas_official
- watchgooroo (95430)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- 6ave (94516)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- thrift.books (3953275)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended. ~Thrift.Books
- sheer_reye (6521)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseEXCELLENT BUYER!!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH, STAY SAFE & HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY!!
Reviews (2)
Nov 22, 2016
When you need the best - Core i7
Absolutely phenomenal processor. I do heavy gaming and this thing supplies my GPU with all the data it needs to get maximum frames. I upgraded from a Core i5 and the hyperthreading is noticeable - everything is snappier. There's absolutely no comparison to the i7 of whatever generation.
Apr 09, 2013
Great product; will serve reliably as the workhorse you meant it to be!
2 of 2 found this helpful I originally bought this processor for light-medium gaming, coupled with a mid-range ATI Radeon HD 6670. Mostly for me it is a HTPC (Home Theater PC). Having additional cores helps a good amount, especially in Windows environs. Games are only just now starting to support multi-threading in excess of dual cores, so quads will quickly become a gamer's delight. The extra cores also allow for background applications such as virus scanners to function and not take too much processing power. I'd recommend something like this if you do any sort of video editing/conversion as I have benchmarked and there is a substantial improvement over dual core architecture. Also great for CAD, or any sort of 3D imaging, period. Never forget, however; more cores does not inherently make up for nor should be used instead of higher clocks on less processors. That is to say, unless you really need the extra cores, a nice dual core setup with high clock frequency will do you just fine. Of course, optimally, you'd have a high clock frequency on all four cores, but I digress. The Core 2 Quad Q6600 is essentially two E6600 Core 2 Duo slapped in one package. It makes a great overclocker, also. You can run these things on 3.0 GHz per core stable on most systems with air/stock cooling.