About
All feedback (55)
- proramit (2116)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- computewarehouse (369)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- gf_computers (8822)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you so much for your purchase ❤️❤️ Hope to do more business!
- brooke2022 (591)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseThank you for your support and trust, and look forward to our cooperation again
- squaredpartner (241)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
Reviews (1)
Dec 05, 2020
Big and tacky looking, but nonetheless a nice and versatile mixer that's (almost) perfect for DAW-less jamming.
Works quite well. Sound quality is good even though there's a bit of noise here and there. After a while mine started developing an issue with the gain knob on a few channels. Adjusting them a channel that is actively receiving any amount of signal causes scratchy noises.
It's tricky to route the wet FX output into the solo/monitor output as it requires some external patching. I feel like I'm missing something really simple about aux 2 (FX) or what not but I could never figure out and easy way. The problem appears to be that solo is post-eq, but FX is "post"-post-eq. The hack is then to engage Send FX to Aux 1, then patch Aux 1 send back into an unused channel, and its only at this point that you can solo that channel and hear wet FX into your monitor headphones. That's a weird annoying quirk. Maybe I'm just trying to stretch the workflow in strange directions. On the other hand you can isolate and listen to the output of the FX processor alone in your monitor, so I guess that's cool too.
I'm using the mixer mainly for DAW-less jamming with modular synths and drum machines, so the integrated 16 channel in/out USB interface/external flash drive recording was really the biggest selling point for me at that price. It was important to be able to jam live while also having the possibility to readjust levels and EQs for each channel independently afterwards. Most mixers that try to double as a USB interface usually don't bother and mash all channels into a single stereo output signal before sending that signal on its way to your recording software. It's the same as if you plugged an external recorder to the main output.
Last point of contention is that it's a big and rather ugly mixer. It doesn't matter for a fixed recording/jamming station, but it's not...aesthetic when you take it on the road. Its tacky curvy glossy red sides are a waste of space and an eyesore. The size makes it look ridiculous if you're not surrounding it with a whole bunch of gears. A little too much '00s for my taste.
All things considered I really like this mixer, but if I had just started shopping for a mixer today and had a little more money I would probably go for the 1010music Bluebox. It's way more compact and aesthetic and does everything I need without all the recording studio features/fluff I don't use on the Behringer.