About
All feedback (404)
- qjspeed (3912)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- dgkunkungy08 (2476)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- photoadd (231247)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- rhinosystemsnavage (22624)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGreat buyer!
- nora*store- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- city-green (684349)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
Reviews (2)
Jan 22, 2018
bker
I found that this item offered me the best functionality for my purposes. I use it to feed vegetables into my juicing machine that has a 3inch shoot. All the other ones I see on the market are approximately 2 or less inches which would reduce the advantages of a wide mouth shoot on the juicing machine. It is also great for the transfer of nuts and other loose items from packages to jars with a 3 inch or larger opening.
Dec 14, 2016
Senso Bluetooth Headhones
2 of 5 found this helpful The headphones are well designed except for the over the ear clips. The clips are made of limp structure less rubber that have no value in holding the ear pieces in place. The hole purpose of getting these headphones with this design is to keep the ear piece in place during physical activity. With just walking, the ear piece is loose in 10 - 15 minutes. In a more active situation the time in place would be less. When lose, the clips do almost nothing to keep the ear piece in place or even on the ear. The design should have been with malleable rubber clips with a wire structure that can be adjusted and formed to conform to the ear to hold it comfortably in place. Were it not for this gross miscalculation in design, it would have rated a 5 star. It is rated a poor value because of the functionality and not because of the cost. Because the design renders this useless for its intended purpose, i.e., exercise it gets a low rating.