Skip to main content
39 items sold
4 followers

About

Location: United KingdomMember since: Jun 18, 2002

All feedback (592)

  • clocks12349 (3138)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Fast payment ~ Valued customer ~ Recommended ~ A1++++++++++++++++++++++++
  • coyboy2009 (1313)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past year
    Verified purchase
    Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended*****
  • rapidonline (200769)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    .·:*¨¨*:·.Thank you for shopping with RAPIDONLINE-visit again soon.·:*¨¨*:·.
  • modellingelectronics (24588)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Great communication. A pleasure to do business with.
  • modellingelectronics (24588)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Quick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
  • g00fie (87704)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Quick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
Reviews (2)
85mm ZOTAC GTX1060 Mini ITX Fan Replacement 40mm 4Pin T129215SH 12V 0.30A R248
Dec 08, 2021
Noisy bearing vibration after just one day in use. Poor quality.
I bought this to replace the original Zotac fan on a GTX960 GPU which developed noisy bearinings after a couple of years. After less than one day in use, the bearings in this replacement became just as noisy as the original. Unlike the original, you can gain access to the bearing by removing the rear sticker. The design is crude:- The rear of the shaft is secured by a nylon split washer. Underneath are four small neoprene O ring spacers. The single bearing sleeve is at the front of the shaft and is only 3 or 4 mm long. It provides no support for the rear of the shaft. Consequently the rear is free to wobble around. I suspect this the cause of the vibration noise. A smear of grease lubricates the bearing. I have now ordered a different fan that uses a pair of ball bearings. This one will probably end up in the bin.
1 of 1 found this helpful
JETSTAR STANDARD FILM inkjet printers PCB circuit board clear drafting Film UV
Sep 02, 2017
Insufficient Print Density using Epson dye based inks
I tried using this film with an Epson 1500W inkjet and Epson dye based inks. Even when using the 'Heavyweight Matt' paper setting, the print denstity was insufficient to completely block light. The track edges look ragged when the film is backlit and viewed using a loupe. The only way I could increase the density sufficiently was by feeding the film back into the printer and overprinting a second time. Unfortunately this often results in registration errors. I don't know if pigment inks would give better results.