Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
About this product
Product Identifiers
PublisherCambridge University Press
ISBN-100521136679
ISBN-139780521136679
eBay Product ID (ePID)80029466
Product Key Features
Number of Pages444 Pages
LanguageEnglish
Publication NameHeraclitus : the Cosmic Fragments
Publication Year2010
SubjectHistory & Surveys / Ancient & Classical
TypeTextbook
AuthorHeraclitus
Subject AreaPhilosophy
FormatTrade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height1 in
Item Weight19.7 Oz
Item Length8.5 in
Item Width5.5 in
Additional Product Features
Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional
IllustratedYes
Table Of ContentIndex of Fragments; Note on the Second Impression; Preface; Abbreviations; Introduction: I. The Date of Heraclitus, II. The Life of Heraclitus, III. The Ancient Evidence on Heraclitus' Thought; The Cosmic Fragments: Group 1-12; Epilogue; General index; Index of passages.
SynopsisThis work provides a text and an extended study of those fragments of Heraclitus' philosophical utterances whose subject is the world as a whole rather than man and his part in it. Professor Kirk's method is critical and objective, and his 1954 work marks a significant advance in the study of Presocratic thought., This work provides a text and an extended study of those fragments of Heraclitus' philosophical utterances whose subject is the world as a whole rather than man and his part in it. Professor Kirk discusses fully the fragments which he finds genuine and treats in passing others that were generally accepted as genuine but here considered paraphrased or spurious. In securing his text, Professor Kirk has taken into account all the ancient testimonies, and in his critical work he attached particular importance to the context in which each fragment is set. To each he gives a selective apparatus, a literal translation and and an extended commentary in which problems of textual and philosophical criticism are discussed. Ancient accounts of Heraclitus were inadequate and misleading, and as Kirk wrote, understanding was often hindered by excessive dogmatism and a selective use of the fragments. Professor Kirk's method is critical and objective, and his 1954 work marks a significant advance in the study of Presocratic thought.