African Rank-And-File by Timothy Parsons (1999, Trade Paperback)
ThriftBooks (3953148)
98.9% positive feedback
Price:
$49.61
Free shipping
Est. delivery Sat, Aug 30 - Sat, Sep 6Estimated delivery Sat, Aug 30 - Sat, Sep 6
Returns:
30 days returns. Seller pays for return shipping.
Condition:
Very GoodVery Good
The African Rank-and-File (Social History of Africa) by Timothy Parsons May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
About this product
Product Identifiers
PublisherHeinemann
ISBN-100325001405
ISBN-139780325001401
eBay Product ID (ePID)208890
Product Key Features
Number of Pages328 Pages
Publication NameAfrican Rank-And-File
LanguageEnglish
SubjectAfrica / General, General
Publication Year1999
TypeTextbook
AuthorTimothy Parsons
Subject AreaEducation, History
FormatTrade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height0.7 in
Item Weight16.5 Oz
Item Length9.2 in
Item Width6.1 in
Additional Product Features
Intended AudienceTrade
LCCN99-025009
Dewey Edition21
TitleLeadingThe
Grade FromCollege Freshman
IllustratedYes
Dewey Decimal355.3/51/09676
Table Of ContentContents: Illustrations Acknowledgments Abbreviations Introduction The King's African Rifles Recruiting and the Doctrine of "Martial Race" Military Life Army Women and Military Families Discipline and Resistance Ex-Servicemen Epilogue Appendix A: The Organization of the KAR Appendix B: Interviews Appendix C: Currency and Comparative Values Selected Bibliography
SynopsisPaper Edition. The African Rank-and-File explores why East Africans in the King's African Rifles (KAR) served a foreign power, which denied them the rights of full citizenship and was at best paternalistic and at worst openly oppressive., The African Rank-and-File explores why East Africans in the King's African Rifles (KAR) served a foreign power, which denied them the rights of full citizenship and was at best paternalistic and at worst openly oppressive. The KAR was a viable institution because it advanced, to varying degrees, the interests of the colonial state, the British military establishment, and African soldiers. These interests were quite often contradictory, and it took an ongoing process of negotiation and accommodation over the social status of the African soldiery to make the KAR work. Tensions such as these were not unique to the colonial military; the co-option of Africans as chiefs, policemen, teachers, and clergymen produced similar points of friction. Like other important intermediary classes, African soldiers performed a vital service for the colonial regime and sought to exploit its inherent weaknesses to enhance their position in colonial society. Their ability to do so exposed some of the most fundamental tensions and contradictions of British colonial rule.