|Listed in category:
This listing sold on Wed, Jun 5 at 10:26 AM.
Have one to sell?

RARE Vtg SEALED Sweet Valley High Puzzle “Double Love” Milton Bradley 1988 250pc

US $15.16
or Best Offer
Was US $18.95 (20% off)What does this price mean?
Recent sales price provided by the seller
Condition:
New
Ended: Jun 05, 2024 10:26:11 PDT
Shipping:
US $9.21 Standard Shipping. See detailsfor shipping
Located in: Albany, Oregon, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Wed, Jun 26 and Mon, Jul 1 to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
Seller does not accept returns. See details- for more information about returns
Payments:
      
Earn up to 5x points when you use your eBay Mastercard®. Learn moreabout earning points with eBay Mastercard

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. Learn moreeBay Money Back Guarantee - opens new window or tab
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:355696718430

Item specifics

Condition
New: A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item (including handmade items). See the seller's ...
Game Title
Sweet Valley High
Number of Pieces
250 - 499 Pieces
Color
Multi-Color
Material
Cardboard
Gender
Boys & Girls
Age Level
8-11 Years
Game Type
Puzzle
Brand
Milton Bradley
Year
1988
Theme
Based on book series
Recommended Age Range
8+
Country/Region of Manufacture
United States
Character Family
Sweet Valley High

Item description from the seller

CLSCollection

CLSCollection

98.8% positive feedback
898 items sold
Joined Feb 2022
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
4.9
Reasonable shipping cost
4.8
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (336)

i***m (2)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Arrived by the estimated date in the condition I expected.🙂
See all feedback