 |
Coming from a 10900k I see a slower speed increase in responsiveness. The system was much snappier with my 10900k than this 13700kf with the same memory. I didn't have my 10900k overclocked and neither is this 13700kf. Have it paired with a Z790 Aorus Elite Pro AX DDR4, Samsung B-die 32 gigs and WD BLACK 850X 1 TB drive. 10900k memory latency is 43ns. This 13700KF is 58ns with the same timings! Yes the 13700KF has higher IPC by around 25% compared to cpuz single thread and much higher multi-core by a whopping 70% at least. The thing I hate most about these new processors on both Intel and AMD is that these processors run at insane temperatures out of the box. Of course the manufacture will tell you it's designed that way but anyone and everyone who works in any semi-conductor fabrication can tell you that it will degrade faster with high temps. That's simple physics. I can tell in gaming the stuttering seems to have went away mostly. My 6800XT was already pushed to the limit with the 10900k in 1440p. However, in Red Dead 2 I can tell the stuttering in the 50-60ish FPS has mostly went away with a little here in there. I do see about a 6% improvement in Frames per second overall in 1440p across games. Not worth it at all. These reviewers show 1080p results and most do not play in 1080p with high end hardware. Don't believe these reviewers because they are just sells men for these big companies. No one plays at 1080p hardly anyway. 1440p and 4k is what most are playing at these days and you will be GPU bound. If you have a Ryzen 5000 series chip or Intel 8000 and you mostly game at 1440P or above it's not worth the upgrade. Read full review
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: New
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best Selling in CPUs/Processors
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on CPUs/Processors
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- You may also like
