Reviews
Epstein''s book bursts with theoretical insights. . . .Inclusionalso vividly and concretely illustrates how power operates through state and scientific classificatory processes. . . . It will be of interest to many--scholars in science studies, critical studies of race and gender, social movement studies, political sociology, and social theory, as well as medical professionals and health policy advocates and experts., Steven Epstein masterfully weaves together sociologies of science, policy, social movements, and stratification to provide a cogent-and very readable-analysis of inclusion and difference as they have played out in biomedicine and politics. He deftly traces the emergence and implementation of the sex/gender, race, and age inclusion policies of the federal government's health research apparatus. In doing so, Epstein identifies some of the ironic consequences of the contemporary focus on difference-for example, how attempts to address disadvantage and exclusion of vulnerable groups end up exacerbating stigma or discrimination against them. As such, his book makes an important contribution to knowledge about the interworkings of science, state, and society., Steven Epstein masterfully weaves together sociologies of science, policy, social movements, and stratification to provide a cogent--and very readable--analysis of inclusion and difference as they have played out in biomedicine and politics. He deftly traces the emergence and implementation of the sex/gender, race, and age inclusion policies of the federal government's health research apparatus. In doing so, Epstein identifies some of the ironic consequences of the contemporary focus on difference--for example, how attempts to address disadvantage and exclusion of vulnerable groups end up exacerbating stigma or discrimination against them. As such, his book makes an important contribution to knowledge about the interworkings of science, state, and society., "Epstein''s use of theory to demonstrate how public policies in the health profession are shaped makes this book relevant for many academic disciplines. . . . Highly recommended."-Choice, "This book restores my confidence in the ability of good sociology to illuminate and clarify issues of public policy that are as complex as they are consequential (for all of us). There are no simple stories here, no obvious villains or heroes. Things happen for unexpected and unplanned reasons, every political gain contains risk of loss, and virtue does not line up permanently with any cause or person. This is a gem of a book, written in an accessible and engaging style."-Thomas Gieryn, Indiana University, A delightful read. Epstein''s writing is accessible without oversimplifying, making the book a real option in both undergraduate and graduate courses. . . . Inclusion is exemplary not only for the compelling account it provides, nor just for the reams of compelling evidence Epstein incorporates, but also for its deftness in marrying together different disciplinary perspectives of Science Studies, Sociology, History, and Politics, to name a few. . . . A pleasure to read from beginning to end., "In this fascinating book, Steven Epstein explains how beginning in the 1980s a variety of social movements prevailed in changing inclusion criteria of unrepresented research subjects in clinical trials in the United States. In a relatively short period of time, medical researchers were expected to include more women, racial and ethnic minorities, children, and elderly as research subjects. Epstein pays close attention to the historical precedents of the arguments used in favor and against this change in thinking about what kind of differences matter in biomedical research, its consequences for research, and its far-reaching implications for identity politics. The result is a convincing, widely-accessible, and well-written account of the legal, political, social, and scientific aspects of this change in policy and thinking."--Stefan Timmermans, author of Postmortem, "In this fascinating book, Steven Epstein explains how beginning in the 1980s a variety of social movements prevailed in changing inclusion criteria of unrepresented research subjects in clinical trials in the United States. In a relatively short period of time, medical researchers were expected to include more women, racial and ethnic minorities, children, and elderly as research subjects. Epstein pays close attention to the historical precedents of the arguments used in favor and against this change in thinking about what kind of differences matter in biomedical research, its consequences for research, and its far-reaching implications for identity politics. The result is a convincing, widely-accessible, and well-written account of the legal, political, social, and scientific aspects of this change in policy and thinking."--Stefan Timmermans, author of Postmortem , "Epstein''s use of theory to demonstrate how public policies in the health profession are shaped makes this book relevant for many academic disciplines. . . . Highly recommended."- Choice, "This 'recovering' politician has many scars from fighting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to get them to abandon their one size fits all/white males only research policy. Steven Epstein''s book is a must read now that progressives won and inclusion is the new NIH research model. Inclusion has found many differences between people based on age, gender, race and other categories, but Epstein''s book reminds us some of these differences could be caused by socioeconomic conditions. Citizens need to discern differences that are genetic and those driven by economic status, so politicians cannot use those differences to reinforce stereotypes they wish to create. Hurrah for a book that''s not afraid to wade out there and clear the mines out of the field! That''s what Epstein does."-Patricia Schroeder, This 'recovering' politician has many scars from fighting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to get them to abandon their one size fits all/white males only research policy. Steven Epstein's book is a must read now that progressives won and inclusion is the new NIH research model. Inclusion has found many differences between people based on age, gender, race and other categories, but Epstein's book reminds us some of these differences could be caused by socioeconomic conditions. Citizens need to discern differences that are genetic and those driven by economic status, so politicians cannot use those differences to reinforce stereotypes they wish to create. Hurrah for a book that's not afraid to wade out there and clear the mines out of the field! That's what Epstein does., "This book restores my confidence in the ability of good sociology to illuminate and clarify issues of public policy that are as complex as they are consequential (for all of us). There are no simple stories here, no obvious villains or heroes. Things happen for unexpected and unplanned reasons, every political gain contains risk of loss, and virtue does not line up permanently with any cause or person. This is a gem of a book, written in an accessible and engaging style."--Thomas Gieryn, Indiana University, This 'recovering' politician has many scars from fighting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to get them to abandon their one size fits all/white males only research policy. Steven Epstein's book is a must read now that progressives won and inclusion is the new NIH research model. Inclusion has found many differences between people based on age, gender, race and other categories, but Epstein's book reminds us some of these differences could be caused by socioeconomic conditions. Citizens need to discern differences that are genetic and those driven by economic status, so politicians cannot use those differences to reinforce stereotypes they wish to create. Hurrah for a book that's not afraid to wade out there and clear the mines out of the field! That's what Epstein does., Epstein''s book bursts with theoretical insights. . . . Inclusion also vividly and concretely illustrates how power operates through state and scientific classificatory processes. . . . It will be of interest to many--scholars in science studies, critical studies of race and gender, social movement studies, political sociology, and social theory, as well as medical professionals and health policy advocates and experts., A delightful read. Epstein's writing is accessible without oversimplifying, making the book a real option in both undergraduate and graduate courses. . . . Inclusion is exemplary not only for the compelling account it provides, nor just for the reams of compelling evidence Epstein incorporates, but also for its deftness in marrying together different disciplinary perspectives of Science Studies, Sociology, History, and Politics, to name a few. . . . A pleasure to read from beginning to end., Inclusion offers a balanced analysis of the positive and negative effects of institutional changes on groups that are traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research and on biomedical research in general. . . . The lessons learned from this book may help researchers and policymakers who are involved in biomedical research rethink their conceptualization of human subgroups for analysis., "Inclusion offers a balanced analysis of the positive and negative effects of institutional changes on groups that are traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research and on biomedical research in general. . . . The lessons learned from this book may help researchers and policymakers who are involved in biomedical research rethink their conceptualization of human subgrouops for analysis."-Elisa J. Gordon, New England Journal of Medicine, Epstein's use of theory to demonstrate how public policies in the health profession are shaped makes this book relevant for many academic disciplines. . . . Highly recommended., " Inclusion offers a balanced analysis of the positive and negative effects of institutional changes on groups that are traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research and on biomedical research in general. . . . The lessons learned from this book may help researchers and policymakers who are involved in biomedical research rethink their conceptualization of human subgroups for analysis."-Elisa J. Gordon, New England Journal of Medicine, Epstein's book bursts with theoretical insights. . . . Inclusion also vividly and concretely illustrates how power operates through state and scientific classificatory processes. . . . It will be of interest to many--scholars in science studies, critical studies of race and gender, social movement studies, political sociology, and social theory, as well as medical professionals and health policy advocates and experts., "Steven Epstein masterfully weaves together sociologies of science, policy, social movements, and stratification to provide a cogent-and very readable-analysis of inclusion and difference as they have played out in biomedicine and politics. He deftly traces the emergence and implementation of the sex/gender, race, and age inclusion policies of the federal government's health research apparatus. In doing so, Epstein identifies some of the ironic consequences of the contemporary focus on difference-for example, how attempts to address disadvantage and exclusion of vulnerable groups end up exacerbating stigma or discrimination against them. As such, his book makes an important contribution to knowledge about the interworkings of science, state, and society."