What makes Vantage Point so original is its use of time. I can't recall a movie that moved back and forth in time the way this one does, and it was done very well.
The plot of the movie takes place in a 20 minute span (of cinematic time, not actual time). With each "vantage" you get further pieces of the puzzle to help you solve the mystery and to tie up all the loose ends.
I gave this a 4 instead of a 5 only because many of the characters were underdeveloped, but that's pretty much a consequence of the movie's format and shouldn't be seen as a detriment of the director.
Dennis Quaid's acting is terrific as is Forest Whitaker (but what else is new).
Certainly worth watching.
This is a decent movie. But with all the suspense, twists & turns, and action, I was totally left with that, "So what?" feeling at the end. The anchor story is of an attempted presidential assassination during a world peace conference. The initial story, seen through the eyes of a CNN-type executive producer (Sigourney Weaver) covering the event, is re-told several times including through the eyes of a local police officer, a secret service agent (Dennis Quaid), a video camera-happy tourist (Forrest Whitaker), the President (William Hurt) and even one of the terrorists. Each rewind segment (or vantage point) adds pieces of the puzzle until we understand the whole plot. There are some neat plot twists and a heart-racing car chase, but this is not even an above average action movie. Despite appearing new to many, the technique of telling a story from several vantage points is as old as Rashomon and Citizen Kane. The movie also fails to tie up so many loose ends (what does happen to Matthew Fox?) or to allow any real closure when it comes to the hundreds of people who die in this movie. In the end, So What?Read full review
I must admit I went into the theater interested, but skeptical. Slowly, I got drawn into things, and by the time the we were at the fourth vantage point, I was fascinated by how all the stories interrelated with each other, and wondering the story would end up.
The acting is uniformly excellent, especially that of Dennis Quaid, who I had previously considered a mostly comic actor, but is very convincing here as a Secret Service agent.
The direction and script are also excellent, especially when you consider both are first-timers in the world of feature films. The script was not without its clichés, but I didn't see most of the plot twists coming, which I can usually spot coming a mile away in a film like this. There was one real groaner of a plot twist that you'd have to be an idiot not to see, but it goes by so fast that it doesn't really matter.
A lot of the audience in the screening I was at got frustrated by the repeated sections, obviously having no attention span. But once the third act of the film kicks into gear, everybody stopped complaining.
Speaking of which, the third act is the payoff which we've all been waiting for. Seeing all the plot threads converge in such a convincing matter was nice, as was the final action scene, which seems like it was plucked right out of one of the Bourne films. This comes as little surprise, since director Pete Travis and Bourne series director Paul Greengrass have worked together in the past.
As skeptical as I had gone in, I came out impressed. Not since The Bourne Ultimatum have I seen such a convincing, engrossing action thriller.Read full review
Vantage Point is a thriller with a twist. Well, aren't they all? But in this case, it was a clever conceit. We see an event through multiple vantage points - the Secret Service Agent, the News Director, The Tourist, The Terrorist, etc. Sounds cool, right? It should have been. But I found myself groaning with increasing frustration with each "rewind".
Each "vantage point" did provide new information and clue us in on that character's role in the grand scheme of things, but the problem was I just didn't care enough and there was too much repeated information. I got bored and frustated by about midway, and knowing that I still had several vantage point rewinds to endure, I grew very ansty.
The cast is a more than capable of handling anything put before them - Dennis Quaid, Sigourney Weaver, William Hurt, Forest Whitaker. Sadly, they just don't have that much to work with, except Whitaker who was the sole bright spot for me.
Now, don't get me wrong. It's not a bad movie, it's just not a good movie and worse yet, for a thriller it wasn't that engaging a film.Read full review
At least it was a short movie at 1.5 hours long. Big name actors/actresses. A wasted performance by Sigourney Weaver, as she was only in the film for about 8 minutes. The story was good. Some real good twists. Seen through the eyes of all sides in this plot to assasinate the US President, it was a little different than most films in this genre. The horrible ending with the little girl. Are you telling me the chase scene that went on for miles and the little girl on foot caught up to them and randomly met up with her mother. Horrible ending. I can't write any more. Up to the last 5 minutes, I'd say it was an acceptable use of time.