It's more politically correct dogma; here's what's provided on the jacket: "This unique anthology provides an introduction to a wide variety of views on human nature. Drawing from diverse cultures over three millennia, Leslie Stevenson has chosen selections ranging from ancient religious texts up to contemporary theories based on evolutionary science. An ideal companion to the editor's previous book, this interdisciplinary reader can also be used independently. The second edition of The Study of Human Nature offers substantial selections illustrating the perspectives discussed in the Bible, Hinduism, Confucianism, Plato, Kant, Marx, Freud, Sartre, B.F. Skinner's behaviorism, Konrad Lorenz's ethnological diagnosis of human aggression, and the author's Ten Theories of Human Nature. The Islamic tradition and 17th-18th century philosophers Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, and Rousseau are also represented. Selections from Rousseau, J.S. Mill, and Nancy Holmstrom raise feminist issues, and Henry Bracken's paper deals with racial issues. [Great. We do so need yet more of those subjects.] Examples from E.O. Wilson's sociobiology and his critics are also included, together with Chomsky and recent examples from evolutionary psychology." Yes, with all these views represented (and only one of them can be right), it pretty much assures us that psychologists just don't know what is going on! Use this book as reference for relatively short explanations.Read full review
Fast paced book and excellent knowledge attained from the readings. If you can understand simple reading then this book is for you.
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best Selling in Textbooks
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on Textbooks