Wright's commentary is plenty long and there are many good paragraphs. The strongest points in the book are his spiritual insights. That being said, three weaknesses really got my goat: 1) Despite repetition, the work is not "verse by verse". He simply skips what he doesn't understand. The last part of the book (covering the temple) is particularly skimpy. 2) He approaches the text from a sermonizing, New Testament viewpoint. The author goes off on rants about the church, our society, and about the spiritual life of Christians yet neglects the detail of Ezekiel. 3) The worst feature however, is the heavily amillennial bias. His hostility toward dispensational scholarship sneaks into every page. In places you wouldn't know this was supposed to be a commentary on Ezekiel as he turns the book into a forum for bashing his theological enemies. I eventually found 368 pages of such opinions tiresome as I was looking for an analysis of Ezekiel rather than an interpretation for today. Here I felt a vindication of the old adage, "It's the smallest rooster in the hen-house that crows the loudest"!Read full review
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best Selling in Books
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on Books