Reviews
"What perfect timing! How Much is Enough ? is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the New York Times in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." --Sylvia Nasar, author of Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius "Deeply provocative and intellectually suggestive...Offers some bold and lucid proposals about what we can do to rein in the fever of reductive economism and toxic acquisitiveness." -- Prospect , Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury "The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" --Nicholas Wapshott, author of Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics "The over-all thrust of their polemic is a welcome call to reinvigorate society's ethical aspect and bring about the good life for everyone." -- The New Yorker " How Much Is Enough? is a delightful book. It addresses a Big Question without the jargon and obfuscation that pollutes so much philosophy. The prose is lucid, and all the relevant issues are raised and addressed." -- The Wall Street Journal "The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx's critique of capitalism, and Aristotle's uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read." -- Publishers Weekly "A provocative and articulate discourse on the dismal science and moral philosophy." -- Kirkus "The Skidelskys move seamlessly from the abstract to the concrete; from philosophy to public policy." -- The Independent "There is a rigor in their view of leisure. It is productive, but not so much of things as of experiences animated by intrinsic motivation. Eliminate the propulsive force of self-interest narrowly pursued, and leisure becomes a form of social wellness, a striving for the common good rather than the individual accumulation of more and more." -- Portland Book Review "[An] intelligent, impassioned, provocative treatise to those who wonder if materialism is necessary to the good life." -- Get Abstract "[B]reath-taking analysis of capitalism as a Faustian bargain with the devil." --Book News, "What perfect timing! How Much is Enough ? is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the New York Times in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." -Sylvia Nasar, author of Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius "Deeply provocative and intellectually suggestive...Offers some bold and lucid proposals about what we can do to rein in the fever of reductive economism and toxic acquisitiveness." - Prospect , Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury "The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" -Nicholas Wapshott, author of Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics "The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx's critique of capitalism, and Aristotle's uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read." - Publishers Weekly "A provocative and articulate discourse on the dismal science and moral philosophy." - Kirkus, "What perfect timing! How Much is Enough ? is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the New York Times in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." --Sylvia Nasar, author of Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius "Deeply provocative and intellectually suggestive...Offers some bold and lucid proposals about what we can do to rein in the fever of reductive economism and toxic acquisitiveness." -- Prospect , Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury "The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" --Nicholas Wapshott, author of Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics "The over-all thrust of their polemic is a welcome call to reinvigorate society's ethical aspect and bring about the good life for everyone." -- The New Yorker " How Much Is Enough? is a delightful book. It addresses a Big Question without the jargon and obfuscation that pollutes so much philosophy. The prose is lucid, and all the relevant issues are raised and addressed." -- The Wall Street Journal "The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx's critique of capitalism, and Aristotle's uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read." -- Publishers Weekly "A provocative and articulate discourse on the dismal science and moral philosophy." -- Kirkus "The Skidelskys move seamlessly from the abstract to the concrete; from philosophy to public policy." -- The Independent "There is a rigor in their view of leisure. It is productive, but not so much of things as of experiences animated by intrinsic motivation. Eliminate the propulsive force of self-interest narrowly pursued, and leisure becomes a form of social wellness, a striving for the common good rather than the individual accumulation of more and more." -- Portland Book Review "[An] intelligent, impassioned, provocative treatise to those who wonder if materialism is necessary to the good life." -- Get Abstract "[B]reath-taking analysis of capitalism as a Faustian bargain with the devil." --Book News, "The Skidelskys ask a pivotal question: Is there no end to our constant quest for more and more wealth? As the world economy stutters and we look for ways to restart the engine, their arguments pull us up short. Are we not prosperous enough already and missing a far richer life without the perpetual quest for needless economic growth?" -Nicholas Wapshott, author of Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics . "What perfect timing! How Much is Enough? is what every graying Baby Boomer I know is asking right now. The Skidelskys argue that time is not ONLY money, as many driven New Yorkers seem to think, and urge workaholic Americans to devote more of it to pursuing the good life. Sounds like wise advice to me. As my desk mate at the New York Times in the 1990s used to remind me at least once a day: All you really HAVE is your TIME ." -Sylvia Nasar, author of Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius "Intriguingly, [the Skidelskys'] intellectual guiding star is not Marx or even Keynes but Aristotle: we are repeatedly brought back to Aristotle's bafflement at the idea that money itself could be regarded as a sort of agent or a sort of life-form, let alone a self-explanatory goal for human activity." Prospect (UK) "The authors turn to historical fiction, philosophy, and political theory, drawing on Faust, Marx's critique of capitalism, and Aristotle's uses of wealth. Their conclusion that concepts like respect, friendship, and community are more likely to contribute to satisfaction and overall happiness than wealth makes for a fascinating, if cerebral, read." Publishers Weekly "A provocative and articulate discourse on the dismal science and moral philosophy." Kirkus
