About
All feedback (20)
- u***t (12)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseFantastic experience. The lens was as described, in great condition, and arrived fairly quickly and safely. Very satisfied.
- t***q (21357)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseA+ transaction
- 3***r (1006)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaselen it very nice . fast shipping
- t***s (284)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseShipped quickly. In perfect, unused condition. Thanks!
- eBay automated feedback- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsOrder delivered on time with no issues
- m***k (299)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseExcellent seller. Gave me extra batteries. Very responsive. Would recommend.
Reviews (1)

Nov 03, 2020
Better than the Canon 135 L f2 but at a price
It's a heavy lens compared to the Canon version. The autofocus is faster than the Canon 135 L f2 and the images are sharper. Image quality and color are quite good on Canon version. It's expensive compared to its Canon counterpart but not a terrible value overall. I use it on a Canon R5 and R6 with excellent results. Overall it is better than the Canon 135 L f2 but heavier and more expensive. It's hard to say whether it is so much better to justify the price differential. The Canon 135 is one of the better regarded L lenses in the Canon lines. For sports the Sigma Art version will likely produce better results with its advantage in sharpness and autofocus speed.
