12 Angry Men (DVD, 2008, 50th Anniversary Edition)
Top Selling in DVDs & Blu-ray Discs
Great Prices on DVDs & Blu-ray Discs
- $9.00Trending at $17.96
- $10.59Trending at $17.99
- $7.45Trending at $7.99
- $14.00Trending at $14.75
- $7.98Trending at $15.95
Most relevant reviews
- papercaperJan 01, 2014by
Great movie. NO problems. Totally captivating & engrossing.
I had been wanting to see this movie again for some time. My nephew, being a Boy Scout, caused me to buy it. He was working on a merit badge for Law. One of the requirements was to watch a movie from the required list. 12 Angry Men was at the top of the list. The dvd had NO glitches and or defects in it whatsoever. Absolutely perfect. We sat and watched it together. Try getting a teenager to watch such a movie. Well, it held his interest all through the movie. He even made comments regarding the deficiencies of some of the jurors, noting noting how things they were doing went totally AGAINST a fair and impartial jury. This is a great movie to see the WRONG way to decide on a verdict. He now has a perspective on how not to be when sitting on a jury and about paying very close attention to details during the trial. Happy to say that he did earn his merit badge.Read full review
- michael_chessma...Jun 02, 2011by
12 Angry men is one of the most important courtroom/jury room dramas ever
12 Angry men is one of the most important courtroom/jury room dramas ever to come out of the United states. The question presented to us in this great movie offerings is this: Is there justice in the level of discourse that is being offered. Is the articulation on the issues in
fact valid or is it semantic like argument on feigns of dubious validity. If a case appears as it should: "open and shut" - is that reason enough to start to discount it? Should you decide that everything that could go the other way hypothetically, no matter how remote the possibility,
that should be the order of the day of a particular brand of "more pure" justice? Should the prejudices carried by members of the jury or testifying witnesses be reason enough to negate and retard their testimony? should they be required as jury members to vote the other side
instead? The OJ Simpson criminal trial contained all of these elements in the minds of those who assembled not too long ago on a PBS panel inquiry headed by talk show host Mr. Charlie Rose. The ownership of property in and of itself should never be sufficient qualification to sit on a jury to decide the fate of members of the community. Instead, a sound grounding in values that are humanistically pure and demonstrably so, combined with sound reasoning skills and experience in the proper and right application of legal principles that come from this sound philosophical basis should rule, and be the requirement. So a panel of judges perhaps, appointed on more than their connections within legal circles as it presently is comprised, rather on an open contest in which real votes for merit may be clearly exercised in the protection of all.
Otherwise, we could someday die for no other reason than a lack of restraint in the environment caused by a complete breakdown in the expectation of justice based on jury members that are nothing more than proxies for those that would inflict their own brand of justice instead. The OJ Simspon affair should raise just such alarm bells as the second trial rightly pointed out, however it came too late to impose penalties to fit the crime - financial constraints that were imposed subsequently on the defendant could hardly be deemed sane enough for anyone that was looking in at the situation in objective fashion unable to do nothing but "shake their heads" in amazement that this could go on without a public scream that should never end until the righter outcome is seen through instead.Read full review
- collector696969Sep 10, 2012by
The experience was orgasmic to say the least....
Hooba dooba Doobah ditty! I like the girls dancing at the pretty Kitty! dnjosfsdvlvnxovm segfo[dv xc[oVC VS XXVJGJV MV SKVVVVKsvko - gj gnohu vn ggfovfvfjvad[fvvn]V VHDFVHJF]V VADFBFVANFOVVJFVFVFVJVSVVSVJFVJJVFVJJ. ghertytd;z s adohidfb hfihdidhf idf sif sdsdosod efhhf f dv vdbosdhbvDB uvcSV Sdbv iSVSv ia fnva vav av CVsd sHJV SDIBVNB Vpsdovdvbavs AFHdffyefw f ng vfndv sd SHDF D. These reviews are freakin stupid. Why the hell does anyone care what I think? It's not like the people who read this know who I am or what my tastes are.... Hooba Dooba Doobah ditty..... And you can quote me...
- leverage47Jul 14, 2016by
The DVD came exactly how I wanted it!!!
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: New
- leveret_incJun 17, 2009by
my best movie ever
what do i like about this movie??????? EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!! what a great movie, for me a great movie means 3 things, 1) great acting, 2) something you can learn from the movie, 3) you can say after seeing it oh this actor sounds just like my father/mother/grandfather/cousin/or somebody, the point is that this movie shows you the tipical guy from the streets who doesn't give a **** about some poor boy getting killed, because he wants to go to a ball game, AND YES this movie was made when hollywood was a place runned by normal people who didn't hate this country, and by people who didn't think that only a movie that has a sex scene is supposed to be a good movie,